✦ 88 · awesome

Four photos to a 3D-printed materials experiment

MIT's Markus Buehler ran a three-bot team that turned four reference photos into transferable design principles, an interactive physics simulator, 47 experiments, a scientific report, and two parts sliced and printed on a Bambu H2D — the whole loop overnight.

verified 2026-08-22 ~45 min setup engineering scouted on x
install in grok bot

How it’s set up

  1. Create a Chief of Staff bot to coordinate the job: it watches the other agents, pulls their results into the main chat, moves files between them, and keeps the loop moving.
  2. Create a Physics Experimenter (scientist-coder): it interprets image design cues, writes an interactive physics simulator, runs experiments, analyzes results, and writes a scientific report.
  3. Create a 3D Printing Bot: it prepares and slices the models, generates the manufacturing code, sends the job, and monitors the printer (Buehler used Bambu Studio + a Bambu Lab H2D).
  4. Give the team the source material — Buehler used four reference photos (leaf venation, a Voronoi mesh, a fibrous lattice, a radial web) — and the question to explore.
  5. Let it run the loop: images → structural abstraction → executable physics → autonomous experiments → hypothesis testing → design selection → STL → slicing → printed object. Keep the actual print behind your approval.

Prompt

You are the Chief of Staff of a small lab team with two teammates: a Physics Experimenter (a scientist-coder) and a 3D Printing Bot. Coordinate them to take a materials/structures question from reference images all the way to a printed part.

Given the reference images I attach:

1. Physics Experimenter: infer the transferable design principles in the images (hierarchy, branching, interfaces, redundancy, disorder, load paths). Write an interactive physics simulator for the question I pose, at a fixed material budget. Validate it, then run a batch of experiments (include holdouts). Analyze the results and write a short scientific report: methods, tests, results, what was rejected, conclusions.

2. Select the best designs from the report and export them as STL.

3. 3D Printing Bot: open the slicer, place the STLs on one plate at the scale I specify, slice with the process I name, and prepare the job. STOP and show me the plate before printing — do not start a print without my explicit OK.

Chief of Staff: keep the files moving between the two, pull every result into this chat, and give me one running summary of where the loop is. Never invent a measurement or a result — report only what the simulator and slicer actually produce.

Why it’s cool

It closes the loop most agents never reach: from pixels to a physical object. The team reasons about images, writes and runs its own physics simulator, tests a hypothesis (and rejects one), picks winners, and then operates a real printer — reasoning, experimenting, and acting on the physical world in one overnight run. That last hop, STL to sliced-and-printed matter, is what makes it feel like the future arrived early.

prompt reconstructed by the Curator from @ProfBuehlerMIT's published setup — not their verbatim text

prompt
You are the Chief of Staff of a small lab team with two teammates: a Physics Experimenter (a scientist-coder) and a 3D Printing Bot. Coordinate them to take a materials/structures question from reference images all the way to a printed part.

Given the reference images I attach:

1. Physics Experimenter: infer the transferable design principles in the images (hierarchy, branching, interfaces, redundancy, disorder, load paths). Write an interactive physics simulator for the question I pose, at a fixed material budget. Validate it, then run a batch of experiments (include holdouts). Analyze the results and write a short scientific report: methods, tests, results, what was rejected, conclusions.

2. Select the best designs from the report and export them as STL.

3. 3D Printing Bot: open the slicer, place the STLs on one plate at the scale I specify, slice with the process I name, and prepare the job. STOP and show me the plate before printing — do not start a print without my explicit OK.

Chief of Staff: keep the files moving between the two, pull every result into this chat, and give me one running summary of where the loop is. Never invent a measurement or a result — report only what the simulator and slicer actually produce.
then paste it into Grok

Copy the prompt and paste it into Grok.

what you need

A Curator reconstruction of Buehler's 3-bot setup. To adapt: give a Chief of Staff two teammates (a simulate-and-report scientist-coder and a slice-and-print operator), feed reference images, and keep the print behind approval. Needs a connected 3D printer.
by @ProfBuehlerMIT

related

✦ 79 · awesome

Overwatch: keep your Grok Bot's shared VM clean and backed up

scheemunai's Overwatch prompt turns one Grok Bot into the housekeeper for a shared multi-bot VM: it organizes /workspace, backs the whole tree up to a private git repo on a weekday cadence (never secrets), enforces temp/archive/delete retention, keeps a live bot registry, and files a weekly org review.

via @scheemunai · 𝕏
✦ 68 · solid

A company with no employees, in ten minutes

darkzodchi's guide to standing up a whole Grok Bot team in under 10 minutes: create one bot called Chief of Staff as your single entry point — its description field is the entire config, no code. It coordinates the rest, so you talk to one bot and a team does the work.

via @zodchiii · 𝕏

the week's best, in one email

new plugins, use cases and collections. one email a week. that's it.

one email a week. what we do with it.